- The Breakdown
- Posts
- đȘ Friday chaotic charts
đȘ Friday chaotic charts
This weekâs market crash was âto be expectedâ

Brought to you by:
âChaos is a ladder.â
â Littlefinger, Game of Thrones

Friday chaotic charts
This weekâs market crash was âto be expected,â the president said yesterday, because âthis is a patient that was very sick. We inherited a terrible economy.â
But this morningâs job data confirmed that the patient was hale and hearty as recently as last week.
Not everythingâs perfect, of course: The federal debt is too big, for example, and unemployment is 4.2%, not 0%.
But treating these minor economic symptoms by deliberately crashing the economy is like amputating a leg to treat a splinter.
Also, the doctor appears to be a quack.
âOn economics Mr. Trumpâs assertions are flat-out nonsense,â The Economist opined this morning.
The biggest nonsense this week was perhaps the presidentâs assertion that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were not a cause of the Great Depression, as every economist agrees, but a preventive cure that was applied too late.
The crushing 1930s depression âwould have never happened if they had stayed with the tariff policy,â he claimed in a bit of revisionist-history worthy of George Orwellâs 1984.
There were a lot of these kinds of up-is-down claims this week â to Orwellâs âwar is peaceâ and âfreedom is slaveryâ we can now add âeconomic suffering is liberation.â
I remain hopeful that we won't soon be living in a real-world version of Orwellâs Oceania, but the president does seem intent on turning the globalist US into a new Hermit Kingdom.
The original Hermit Kingdom was one of three countries excluded from this weekâs tariffs, simply because thereâs no trade with North Korea to tariff.
That might soon become less of an exception and more of a rule.
Tim Geithner told the Odd Lots podcast yesterday that President Trumpâs new 70%-ish tariff on China could completely eliminate trade between the two countries.
Itâs hard to imagine that eliminating trade between the worldâs two largest economies will work out well for either China or the US.
But of the two, the Wall Street Journal thinks China is more likely to come out ahead: âMr. Trumpâs tariffs may have the U.S. investing to create jobs in shoe-making when it should invest in AI. This misallocation of capital will not make the U.S. more competitive against China.â
Currency markets appear to agree.
Tariffs were expected to make the US dollar go a little higher, partly because countries exporting to the US were expected to devalue their currencies to offset the tariffs like they did to some degree in Trumpâs first term.
This time, however, the dollar has gone a lot lower â possibly because the tariffs are so extreme that countries like China will simply give up on trading with the US.
âThis is what happens when people think they don't need dollars, which makes sense if trade is pushed outside our borders,â Neil Dutta explains.
This should give the president pause.
In his first term, the inflationary effect of tariffs was diminished because the US dollar appreciated against the currencies of its major trading partners.
Now, the inflationary effects will be amplified because the dollar is depreciating.
Itâs unlikely heâll pause long enough to think about it, of course â this is, after all, a person who appears to believe that drug traffickers pay tariffs on the fentanyl they smuggle across the border.
Iâm guessing he mispoke on that one, but Justin Wolfers believes the presidentâs actions this week were not a lot more rooted in reality than that: âMonstrously destructive, incoherent, ill-informed tariffs based on fabrications, imagined wrongs, discredited theories and ignorance of decades of evidence.â
But âthe real tragedy, Wolfers says, âis that they will hurt working Americans more than anyone else.â
Currency markets appear to be saying something similar: A falling dollar suggests that Trumpâs tariffs are likely to make the US poorer relative to the rest of the world.
China thinks so, too.
âThe Chinese believe they can survive Trumpâs onslaught,â Martin Wolf wrote after a visit to China two weeks ago. âIndeed, many believe it may help them, by destroying US credibility and perceptions of its competence.â
I imagine theyâre feeling even better about that now.
If President Trumpâs tariff chaos is building a ladder, itâs China that seems most likely to climb it.
Letâs check the charts.
The patient should get a second opinion:
Since 1975, when the US last ran a trade surplus, Americansâ real income (ie, adjusted for inflation) is up 133%. Pretty healthy, Iâd say.
Trade is not zero-sum, Mr. President:
As measured by GDP per capita, people in both America and China have been getting richer â but Americans have been extending their lead. Americaâs GDP per capita is now $52,000 greater than Chinaâs, up from $43,000 greater in 1990.
You keep using that wordâŠ
President Trumpâs tariffs are so much higher than any other developed countryâs that theyâre literally off the charts. We were promised âreciprocolâ but got disproportionate instead.
Stagflation in a picture:
Apolloâs Torsten SlĂžk estimates that a 22% effective tariff rate (which sounds low?) would take 1.5% off of US GDP and add 1.5% to US inflation.
Recession odds:
Polymarket bettors put the odds of the US falling into recession in 2025 at 56%. That feels approximately 44% too low to me â but I guess itâs still possible the president changes his mind.
Itâs just China:
Per this chart from Brad Setser itâs really just China thatâs been growing its trade surplus. Every other country in the world can feel unjustly accused by the presidentâs tariffs this week.
Worse than Smoot-Hawely:
Thereâs approximately one person in America that thinks Smoot and Hawley had the right idea and he happens to be the president. Ugh.
Ok, fine. Not one person. But not many, either:
14% of Americans agree with the president that foreign trade is a âthreat to the economyâ but 81% disagree, seeing trade as an âopportunity for economic growth.â 81%! I didnât think there was anything that 81% of Americans agreed on.
A glimmer of hope?
The FTâs John Burn-Murdoch cites survey data from YouGov showing that President Trumpâs non-Maga voters are losing faith in his stewardship of the economy. Unfortunately, the president no longer seems to care what anyone thinks, according to reporting by the Washington Post. But maybe Republican Senators and Congressmen do?
Itâs a bull market in uncertainty:
Economic policy uncertainty is unofficially in chaos territory.
Markets love to climb a wall of worry, so maybe this is just yet another buying opportunity for investors with steelier nerves than me.
But, I donât know, it feels like weâre beyond worry this time and into chaos.
If so, President Trumpâs tariffs might prove to be a ladder that only China can climb.
Have a great weekend, free-trading readers.
â Byron Gilliam
Brought to you by:
Today Kinto lists $K pioneering fair tokenomics in DeFi.
It marks a major milestone in Kintoâs growth, following a successful ICO that raised $3.84 million from over 2,700 participants paired with a $20m deployment by Brevan Howard Digital in their mining program.
Kinto is the modular exchange enabling users to access the best opportunities in DeFi while keeping full control of their funds â join today to earn $K via their mining program.


This Is What Capitulation Feels Like

This week, Tony Greer and Jared Dillian from Macro Dirt join the roundup to discuss the fallout of Trumpâs tariffs, what markets weâre eyeing during this meltdown, and how to manage risk as a trader. We also delve into commodities, tax cuts, bitcoinâs resilience, and more.
Listen to Forward Guidance on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or YouTube.
NO SLEEP TILL BROOKLYN
Permissionless IV is where you stress-test your vision. This conference is for the engineers, founders, and devs building the next cycleâs backbone. If youâre scaling infra, rewriting DeFi, or experimenting with new primitives, come join us.
Speaker applications? Open.
Hackathon devs? Your ticket is covered.